Tag Archives: books

Month in Review [April 2013]

Posted by

26

April was a busy month for me, but it was also a good one. I’m happy that I finally sat down to read another book, even if it was the weakest I have read from Bukowski (one of my favorite authors). I also played through a few video games, watched some great films, and even started a new TV show. Here’s the rundown:

In order of viewing: (including my ratings)
1) The Dark Knight Returns: Part 2 [2013] - 8/10
The Dark Knight Returns: Part 2

2) He Got Game [1998] - 6/10
He Got Game [1998]

3) Winnebago Man [2010] - 9/10
Winnebago Man [2010]

4) Spring Breakers [2013] - 7/10
Spring Breakers [2013]

5) Evil Dead [2013] - 8/10
Evil Dead [2013]

6) Trance [2013] - 7/10
Trance [2013]

7) I’m Not There [2007] - 5/10
I'm Not There [2007]

8) 28 Weeks Later [2007] - 5/10
28 Weeks Later [2007]

9) The Elephant in the Living Room [2011] - 8/10
The Elephant in the Living Room [2011]

10) Y tu mamá también [2002] - 9/10
Y tu mamá también [2002]

11) Dear Zachary: A Letter to a Son About His Father [2008] - 9/10
Dear Zachary: A Letter to a Son About His Father [2008]

12) Blood Simple. [1984] - 8/10
Blood Simple. [1984]

13) Killer’s Kiss [1955] - 7/10
Killer's Kiss [1955]

14) Kansas City Confidential [1952] - 7/10
Kansas City Confidential [1952]

15) 42 [2013] - 7/10
42 [2013]

16) Mud [2013] - 8/10
Mud [2013]

17) Shotgun Stories [2007] - 8/10
Shotgun Stories [2007]

Video Games Completed:
1) Tomb Raider [Xbox 360, 2013] - 8.5/10
Tomb Raider [Xbox 360]

2) Guacamelee! [PS Vita, 2013] - 8.5/10
Guacamelee! [PS Vita/PS3]

3) Gears of War: Judgment [Xbox 360, 2013] - 7.5/10
Gears of War: Judgment [Xbox 360, 2013]

TV Shows Watched:
1) Girls [Season 1] - 7.5/10
Girls [Season 1]

Books Read:
1) “Pulp” by Charles Bukowski - 6/10
"Pulp" by Charles Bukowski

Movie of the Month: I’m starting to notice a trend here — my 50 Movies Project has been incredibly prosperous this year, with most of my “movies of the month” being from it. This month is no exception: Y tu mamá también blew me away, and it is easily one of the highlights from this month. Other contenders were two emotional documentaries: Winnebago Man and Dear Zachary. The former was surprisingly heartwarming, while the latter was absolutely devastating. Both are stellar films.

Dud of the Month: I’m a huge Bob Dylan fan, but I had a really difficult time getting into I’m Not There. The cast was phenomenal, but the scattershot narrative was just too much. I also found 28 Weeks Later to be a very underwhelming sequel.

Got a favorite from this list? What’s the best movie you watched last month?

About these ads

Month in Review [January 2013]

Posted by

24

Wow, are we really one month into 2013 already? It seems like just yesterday we were celebrating New Year’s Eve. It was a pretty good month for me — the work was flowing, yet I still managed to get in some quality entertainment. From now on, I’m going to include my monthly video game and book reading tallies as well. Hopefully the latter will encourage me to read more often, something I want to do more of.

In order of viewing:
1) Killer Joe [2011]
Killer Joe [2011]

2) Fast, Cheap & Out of Control [1997]
Fast, Cheap & Out of Control [1997]

3) 30 for 30: Four Days in October [2010]
30 for 30: Four Days in October [2010]

4) Fritz the Cat [1972]
Fritz the Cat [1972]

5) Michael [2011]
Michael [2011]

6) Trees Lounge [1996]
Trees Lounge [1996]

7) Bring Me the Head of Alfredo Garcia [1974]
Bring Me the Head of Alfredo Garcia [1974]

8) Shakespeare in Love [1998]
Shakespeare in Love [1998]

9) Les Misérables [2012]
anne-hathaway-les-miserables

10) Django Unchained [2012]
Django Unchained [2012]

11) Straw Dogs [1971]
Straw Dogs [1971]

12) Headhunters [2011]
Headhunters [2011]

12) Lincoln [2012]
Lincoln [2012]

13) Premium Rush [2012]
Premium Rush [2012]

14) Bachelorette [2012]
Bachelorette [2012]

15) Zero Dark Thirty [2012]
Zero Dark Thirty [2012]

16) Apocalypse Now [1979]*
Apocalypse Now [1979]

17) Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles [1990]*
Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles [1990]

18) Batman: Year One [2011]
Batman: Year One [2011]

19) Batman: Under the Red Hood [2010]
Batman: Under the Red Hood [2010]

20) Nashville [1975]
Nashville [1975]

21) Death Wish [1974]
Death Wish [1974]

22) The Killer is Loose [1956]
The Killer is Loose [1956]

23) End of Watch [2012]
End of Watch [2012]

24) Compliance [2012]
Compliance [2012]

25) Bullhead [2011]
Bullhead [2011]

26) The Rules of Attraction [2002]
The Rules of Attraction [2002]

27) The Big Doll House [1971]
The Big Doll House [1971]

28) Stagecoach [1939]
Stagecoach [1939]

29) Mean Girls [2004]
Mean Girls [2004]

30) The Doors [1991]
The Doors [1991]

31) Commando [1985]
Commando [1985]

* denotes rewatch

Video Games Completed:
1) The Walking Dead: The Game [Xbox 360, 2012]
The Walking Dead: The Game [Xbox 360, 2012]

2) Uncharted: Golden Abyss [Vita, 2012]
Uncharted: Golden Abyss [Vita, 2012]

3) Hotline Miami [PC, 2012]
Hotline Miami [PC]

4) Mark of the Ninja [Xbox 360, 2012]
Mark of the Ninja [Xbox 360, 2012]

5) Mass Effect 3: Leviathan DLC [Xbox 360, 2012]
Mass Effect 3: Leviathan DLC [Xbox 360, 2012]

Books Finished:
1) “The Rules of Attraction” by Bret Easton Ellis
"The Rules of Attraction" by Bret Easton Ellis

Movie of the Month: For modern films, I loved Django Unchained. My second favorite film of the year. For the classics, that’s a really tough call. Stagecoach is probably the *best* of the group (expect a full review next week), but I also loved the two Peckinpah films, Altman’s Nashville, and even Commando, which was awesome, goofy fun.

Dud of the Month: Les Misérables did nothing for me. I loved Anne Hathaway’s brief performance, but lost interest at the halfway point.

How about you guys? See/play/read anything good last month?

Book Review: ‘God’s Middle Finger’ by Richard Grant

Posted by

11

'God's Middle Finger' by Richard Grant

God’s Middle Finger
Author: Richard Grant
Genre: Travel Narrative
Original Release: March 4, 2008

Although I have only been averaging one (usually small) trip a year, I am a traveler at heart. I love visiting new areas, learning about their culture and soaking up as many sights as I can see. Unfortunately, travel is expensive, and I have nowhere near the resources to go abroad as often as I would like. That’s where my addiction to travel narratives comes in. I am a huge sucker for a good travel book so I can romanticize about places unseen and live vicariously through the authors. It’s also fun to read about places that would not be at the top of my must-visit list, especially those that are generally considered dangerous for American tourists (or anyone in general).

God’s Middle Finger is one such travel narrative that caught my eye while perusing Portland, Oregon’s legendary Powell’s Books. Author Richard Grant, a thrill-seeking Englishman, decided he wanted to visit the infamously lawless land of the Sierra Madre mountains of Mexico. Widely considered to be one of the most dangerous places in the world, the Sierra Madre is almost entirely controlled by narcotraficantes (drug traffickers). Law enforcement is sporadic, and the majority of officers are corrupt. It’s basically anything goes, and murder, rape and kidnapping are all common occurrences.

Map of the Sierra Madre

Map of the Sierra Madre

Generally it’s a bad idea to visit the area, but Grant was lured by his sense of adventure as well as his genuine interest in the way of life of its civilians. His initial plan was to follow the nearly 900 mile long range from beginning to end, all while finding locals to act as guides. The beginning of his journey is essentially a game of “pass the gringo”, as he is transferred from one local to another, working his way through the mountains. He is frequently told not to travel alone, but he grows cocky the farther he goes, and eventually rides solo.

Not smart. The book’s prologue directly tells us what’s to come — it opens with Grant being hunted in the middle of the night by two drunk men. Naturally, this happened while traveling alone, unarmed, and in the dark. It’s a hell of a way to open a book, and I was hooked immediately after that point.

It takes a long time for the book to come back to the prologue, and when it does, it ends rather abruptly, but the journey to that point is a very fun read. Grant encounters a number of ridiculous people on the way, most of whom are either heavily armed and/or drunk. He attends religious ceremonies that feature natives getting piss drunk and beating the hell out of each other. He goes treasure hunting with a friendly Mormon, snorts cocaine with the local police, binge drinks with forceful drug lords, and even attempts to teach English at one of the rare local elementary schools. And, of course, he gets hunted in the wild.

As you would guess, there is a lot of craziness contained in this book, and it makes for a very quick read. Grant also generously shares some fascinating history lessons that provide some insight into the Sierra Madre’s culture. It’s hard to imagine that such a ruthless land exists mere minutes from the U.S. border, and it’s also shocking to hear just how much the Mexican economy relies on its drug trafficking (most of which is purchased here). Fans of adventure, travel and/or history should look up God’s Middle Finger — you won’t be disappointed.

8/10

 
As a companion piece to this novel, tomorrow I will be writing about the 1948 classic film, The Treasure of the Sierra Madre.

Quick & Dirty #11: Tucker & Dale vs. Evil, Dead Space 2, Fatal Frame

Posted by

8

It’s been a while. Time to catch up with another round of Quick & Dirty!

BOOKS
"A Walk in the Woods" by Bill Bryson
“A Walk in the Woods” by Bill Bryson
Due to other commitments, my reading time has been kept to a minimum. As such, it took me a lot longer than usual to work my way through this Bryson travel narrative. Normally a light and easy read, A Walk in the Woods is about Bryson and his former college buddy, Katz, tackling the ultimate U.S. hiking trip: all 2,000+ miles of the Appalachian Trail. Both guys are horribly out of shape and have little to no hiking experience, so this is quite the lofty goal for them. Their trip goes about as well as you would expect for a couple of absolute novices, though their time on the trail sure did help them get fit. A lot of people like Bryson’s style of humor, but I found it to be hit-and-miss. I laughed occasionally, but nowhere near as much as others led me to believe I would. To me, the most interesting parts of the book were when he wrote about the history of the trail, including some of the National Park Service’s disappointingly bad decisions over the years. As this book was written in 199?, some of the information is dated, but this is still a decent read overall. 7/10

MOVIES
Tucker & Dale vs. Evil [2010]
Tucker & Dale Vs. Evil [2010]
This horror comedy has been getting a lot of hype, and I am happy to say that it lives up to it. Tucker & Dale are two fun-loving rednecks who are mistakenly typecast as serial killers by a group of vacationing college students. When the students attempt to “save” one of their friends who was taken by Tucker & Dale to rest and recover from an injury, they start falling victim to their own tragic (and hilarious) accidents. In short, it’s funny as hell, and it’s a blast to see the “hicksploitation” genre turned on its head. Lots of gore, lots of laughs, and a great movie to watch with a group of friends. Just, whatever you do, DO NOT WATCH THE TRAILER FIRST. Seriously, it gives away a lot of the funny and WTF moments from the movie. Don’t do it. 8/10

VIDEO GAMES
Dead Space 2 [Xbox 360]
Dead Space 2 [Xbox 360]
I finally have a working Xbox 360 again, so my first goal was to finally play Dead Space 2, the sequel to one of my favorite games from this generation. I am probably about halfway through the campaign right now, and it has not disappointed in the slightest. It feels a little more like an action game than before, but the atmosphere is still very tense with lots of startling moments. There are so many creepy little disturbances that have kept me on edge, such as alarm clocks randomly going off, lights flickering on and off, and corpses suddenly coming to life. This is a game best played in the dark with the volume LOUD. Loving it so far.

Fatal Frame [PS2]
Fatal Frame [PS2]
In my Xbox downtime, I spent more time than usual with the PS2. My goal was to finally go through and finish Fatal Frame, a game I had started years ago but never finished. I opted to start from the beginning, and I am now playing through the final chapter. I love the atmosphere, and the fact that the only “weapon” is a camera makes everything even scarier. I am not in very good shape in this last chapter, however, as my health packs and film are way too low for the current difficulty level. My goal is to finish the game over the weekend and have a new review ready next week.

Resident Evil: Director's Cut [PS1]
Resident Evil: Director’s Cut [PS1]
I hadn’t played any of the Resident Evil games in years, so I thought it would be fun to take a look back at where the series all began. I got a huge kick out of the first game’s terrible B-movie theatrics, including some live action cutscenes with acting that would rival Matt Hannon in Samurai Cop. I ended up playing about twenty minutes or so before calling it quits. The graphics have aged horribly, almost to the point of unplayability, and the gameplay is definitely showing its age. I might pick it back up at some point, but not before tackling some of the bigger and better games in my backlog.

Book Review: “The Book of Basketball” by Bill Simmons

Posted by

0

"The Book of Basketball" by Bill Simmons

The Book of Basketball
Author: Bill Simmons
Original Release: October 27, 2009

Bill Simmons’ “The Book of Basketball” is huge. Well, perhaps “huge” is an understatement. This sucker is massive, a full 700 pages of material. This is the Sports Guy given free reign to write as much as he wants about his favorite subject, basketball.

The Book of Basketball is essentially split up into two main sections. The first half of the book is all over the place, but its main focus is on the history of the sport from its inception through 1984. Why stop at 1984, you ask? As Simmons says, “I needed something extra for the paperback.” Outside of the written history, Simmons lists his top 33 “What If?” scenarios and includes a lengthy chapter on the immortal Wilt Chamberlain vs. Bill Russell debate (his take? Russell, easily). In the second half of the book, Simmons creates his fantasy Hall of Fame in what is essentially his list of the top 96 players of all time, all of whom are ranked in different tiers. It is a very, very long list, and ideally could have been a full-length book in its own right. He also writes about the best teams of all time, and his theoretical best lineup using players of all eras. To put it mildly, this is an exhaustive book.

Given the elongated nature of this opus, it is not surprising that Simmons has a tendency to ramble. He gets off on tangents very easily, often writing about random pop culture nuggets in comparison to the NBA. He is able to get away with this for the most part by including footnotes at the bottom of nearly every single page in the book. Seriously, the dude has a footnote fetish. Some pages have footnotes that take up at least half of the text. This bizarre format definitely takes some getting used to, but the notes are usually entertaining.

This free-form rambling is both a gift and a curse, although Simmons does have a knack for some well-timed jokes. He is a genuinely funny writer, and I found myself laughing a lot while reading. I could have done without some of his 80s pop culture references (was a rant comparing Kobe Bryant to Teen Wolf really necessary?), but for the most part this is a wildly entertaining book.

If you are a fan of the sport, you will enjoy The Book of Basketball. While its excessive length is daunting and could have been trimmed a bit, I found the book to be a surprisingly quick read. Nearly every subject in NBA history is touched upon, and really, who doesn’t enjoy reading lists about the greatest (of anything) of all time? Bill Simmons is a man who knows the game inside out and isn’t afraid to tackle any issue, even discussing racial differences at length, and this makes him all the more gratifying.

8/10

- Helpful tip: If you do end up reading this book, make sure you have this Interactive Guide open in your browser. It has video clips and other helpful media to correspond with what Simmons is talking about.

Moneyball [Michael Lewis, 2003]

Posted by

1

Moneyball [Michael Lewis, 2003]

Moneyball
Author: Michael Lewis
Original Release: 2003

Moneyball is the story of the Oakland Athletics and their general manager Billy Beane, back in the early 2000′s when they were winning games left and right despite having one of the lowest payrolls in the league. While there have been a number of small market teams in recent years to have found success (the Twins and Rays, to name a couple), the story of the A’s is novel because of Beane’s approach to building a team. Beane and his trusting group of assistants threw traditional viewpoints out the window and focused on cold, hard statistics to lead the way. In lieu of paying much attention to standard stats such as RBIs, steals and batting average, the A’s front office focused on OBP (on base percentage) and slugging percentage. Beane, his top assistant Paul DePodesta and others were avid fans of Bill James and his followers of Sabermetrics. These guys wanted players who would take pitches and get on base, not guys who would swing for the fences all of the time or took “unnecessary risks” by attempting to steal a base. This strategy produced outstanding results. In 2001 and 2002, the A’s won 102 and 103 games respectively, and they made the playoffs every year from 2000-03. With their $41 million payroll, they were putting up comparable results to the Yankees, who were spending in excess of $125 million.

The fact that Oakland was able to compete at all with that budget is just outstanding, and reading about the methodology and the management’s thought processes behind their moves is fascinating. Michael Lewis really excels with Moneyball, as he makes baseball statistics seem as exciting as an action thriller. There are so many great stories intertwined in the book that provide even more insight into the team. We learn about Billy Beane’s failures as a baseball player and what ultimately made him pursue a job in the front office. We read about Scott Hatteberg, a former Red Sox catcher who was unable to play behind the plate anymore due to injuries and therefore lost any appeal to 95% of baseball’s teams. Beane coveted Hatteberg since he was a guy who got on base a lot, signed him to a paltry deal and then stuck him at first base where he had no experience playing (every ground ball hit his way gave him a “mini panic attack”). Hatteberg proceeded to put up some impressively consistent numbers and grew confidence on the field. There’s also a chapter about Chad Bradford, an unorthodox relief pitcher stuck in AAA hell with the White Sox, who Beane savvily acquires for practically a bag of peanuts, and then goes on to become one of the key components in the team’s bullpen. Perhaps most intriguing are the moments where we get to listen in on Beane trying to pull a fast one on other general managers, essentially working his ass off to find trades that benefit him yet make the other GMs feel like they got a “fucking A” trade. Never mind the fact that certain teams refuse to even talk to Beane since they got swindled one too many times before. The man has a gift, and he sure knows it.

There’s also a large portion of the book dedicated to the now-infamous 2002 MLB draft in which the A’s selected a bunch of guys in the first round who weren’t even on other teams’ draft boards. Although they did get some players who have had lasting success in the big leagues (albeit to varying degrees) such as Nick Swisher, Mark Teahen and Joe Blanton, they also had their fair share of busts like the “fat-bodied catcher” Jeremy Brown, Ben Fritz and Stephen Obenchain. Still, it was very interesting to look into Beane’s mind and experience his wide range of emotions when he realized he was going to be able to get all of the players he wanted.

Since Moneyball was published in 2003, other teams have adapted to Oakland’s strategy, and many have incorporated the theories into their own systems. There are still critics of Beane’s ideas, especially since the A’s never found much success in the postseason despite winning so many games in the regular season. The aforementioned playoff run from 2000-03 had the same result every year — a heartbreaking game five loss in the first round. Still, you can’t deny that the team really had something special going on during that time. It’s always fun to see David stand up to Goliath, isn’t it? Moneyball is an excellent read from beginning to end, providing insight into a creative front office while delivering entertaining side stories along the way. This is one of the best baseball books available, and I highly recommend it if you are into the sport at all.

9/10

- Also, it should be noted that Moneyball is currently being made into a movie starring Brad Pitt, Jonah Hill and Phillip Seymour Hoffman, and it is coming out in September of this year. Could it turn out as well as The Social Network? One can only hope…

Questions For The Movie Answer Man [Roger Ebert, 1997]

Posted by

0

Questions For The Movie Answer Man [Roger Ebert]

Questions For The Movie Answer Man
Author: Roger Ebert
Original Release: June 1997

In my latest trip to the library, I decided to peruse the movie book section. Naturally, being in Chicago, there were a large number of books by Roger Ebert sitting on the shelf. I decided to pick up a couple of them since I have been gaining a larger appreciation for his work as of late. One of these books, Questions For The Movie Answer Man, is a compilation of his newspaper columns in which he would answer questions about movies submitted by his readers.

Since this book was published in 1997, it is obviously rather dated. Ebert frequently brings up CompuServe, VHS tapes, LaserDiscs and other technological mediums that are indicative of the time period. A good portion of the book’s content is based on popular movies during that time as well — there are multiple Q&As about Forrest Gump, Independence Day and Pulp Fiction, just to name a few examples. Some of these references are laughable today, as are many of the questions that readers have sent in. It’s hard to find any utility in this book in this day and age since we now have the ability to use IMDB and Wikipedia to obtain movie information, and even Snopes to learn about urban legends (i.e. the infamous munchkin hanging from Wizard of Oz).

I have no doubts that in 1997 this book would have been a fun, quick read. However, not even Ebert’s quick wit can make this dated publication worth reading today. While I got a chuckle out of a handful of his occasional snarky replies, I can’t help but feel I should have just watched a movie instead of taking the time to read this. Do yourself a favor and go to the cinema instead — I’m sure even Ebert would approve of this behavior.

5/10

1001 Video Games You Must Play Before You Die [2010]

Posted by

0

1001 Video Games You Must Play Before You Die

1001 Video Games You Must Play Before You Die
Author: Tony Mott, et al.
Original Release: October 26, 2010

Generally speaking, I am a fan of the “1001 (x) you must do before you die” book series. While none of them can hardly be described as the definitive source on their subjects, they are typically well-written and diverse enough to be good coffee table books. The series’ latest addition, 1001 Video Games You Must Play Before You Die, was awfully intriguing to me. Unfortunately, it has a number of issues that make it the weakest edition I have read yet.

First and foremost, the book caters heavily toward recent games. While there is a surprisingly healthy portion dedicated to early 80′s arcade games, at least half of the book focuses on games from 2000 to present. This is a little ridiculous considering how many great 8 and 16-bit games were omitted from the list. Several lesser-known systems such as the Turbografx-16 were woefully overlooked as well.

Now, onto bitching about games missing and/or included. There are some absolutely painful omissions. Suikoden III is included, but not I or II? Neither of the NES Contra games are listed, or any of the NES Castlevanias for that matter. No Crash Bandicoot games at all? Does every single Grand Theft Auto game (including separate entries for the GTA IV expansions) need to be included? Are four Rock Band and five Guitar Hero games really necessary? There are also far too many subpar 360/PS3 games included, such as Just Cause, Prey, and The Darkness, just to name a few. These could have been fleshed out with actual, genuinely good classics from previous eras.

I feel the overall book could have been edited a bit more. There are a handful of odd little inaccuracies listed, and some of the writeups really don’t say much about the games themselves. Also, I can’t help but mention that Ico is name-checked in the foreword written by Peter Molyneux as one of his favorite games, yet it is not listed in the top 1001. Huh?

Truth be told, although the book has its share of faults, it is still a fairly interesting read and can provoke some interesting discussions amongst gamers, which is exactly what a coffee table book of this sort should do. It’s not a *bad* book by any means, but it’s just disappointing as a whole. If you are a video game fan, give it a look but don’t go into it with high expectations.

6/10

For those curious, someone did post the complete list found in the book @ http://pastebin.com/r7zqbbvu It should be noted, however, that the book lists the games via year rather than ABC order.

Fear and Loathing In Las Vegas [1971]

Posted by

4

Fear and Loathing In Las Vegas
Author: Hunter S. Thompson
Original Release: November 1971

“We were somewhere around Barstow on the edge of the desert when the drugs began to take hold.”

This is quite possibly my favorite opening sentence from a novel, and it sets the tone for the drug-addled adventure that is Fear and Loathing In Las Vegas. The story is an exaggerated account of Hunter S. Thompson’s pursuit of the American Dream in Las Vegas. Accompanied by “Dr. Gonzo,” his faithful attorney, Thompson (as Raoul Duke) is initially sent out to Vegas to report on the off road race known as the Mint 400. However, this work is quickly scrapped in favor of just getting blitzed and then becoming involved in random bizarre adventures.

Fear and Loathing is absolutely hilarious, and is certainly one of the funniest books I have ever read. Duke and his attorney find themselves in some very precarious situations. On their ride into Vegas in the “Great Red Shark” (their rented red Chevy convertible), they pick up a hitchhiker who quickly becomes scared shitless by their drug-induced craze. In Vegas, Dr. Gonzo brings a Jesus and Barbara Streisand loving innocent young girl back to their hotel room, where he proceeds to give her acid (when she had never even gotten high before). There is also an extremely amusing encounter with a hotel maid who stumbles into their room when both Duke and his attorney are stark naked. The dialogue is just incredible here, and Thompson’s unique way of writing makes everything even more entertaining.

As mentioned earlier, there is a lot of drug use in this book. The characters are frequently in a state of paranoia because of this, and often see some ridiculous hallucinations (which are brought to life by Ralph Steadman’s amazing illustrations). Just read their drug haul that they brought with them to Vegas:

“We had two bags of grass, seventy-five pellets of mescaline, five sheets of high powered blotter acid, a salt shaker half full of cocaine, and a whole galaxy of multi-colored uppers, downers, screamers, laughers… and also a quart of tequila, a quart of rum, a case of Budweiser, a pint of raw ether and two dozen amyls.

Not that we needed all that for the trip, but once you get locked into a serious drug collection, the tendency is to push it as far as you can.”

If you think that sounds insane, well, you are absolutely right! Some people are turned off from this book because of the drug binges, but if you do so you are missing out on a wildly entertaining and witty novel that also indulges in biting satire. I have lent my copy of this book out to many friends and family members, all of whom have also loved this. Fear and Loathing In Las Vegas is one of my favorite books of all time, a rare novel that I can read over and over again without losing interest. If you are able, pick up the Modern Library version of the book, which also comes with two of Thompson’s short stories. I cannot recommend this book enough!

10/10

Bet the House: How I Gambled Over a Grand a Day for 30 Days on Sports, Poker, and Games of Chance [2010]

Posted by

0

Bet The House
Author: Richard Roeper
Original Release: February 2010

Taking a page from Morgan Spurlock in the film Super Size Me, movie critic Richard Roeper embarked on a mission to spend 30 days in a row gambling. Placing wagers of at least $1,000 every day, Roeper tackled any form of gambling he could find: sports betting, greyhound racing, poker, slots, lotto tickets and even a basic back-and-forth battle flipping coins. There was really no point to this venture other than for the author’s own personal amusement. The book certainly has an interesting concept, but it felt more like Roeper was just looking for an excuse to spend a month gambling more than usual (and apparently he was quite the gambler already).

Bet The House is geared more toward those who partake in gambling themselves. Roeper explains the basics behind each endeavor, but it certainly helps to have knowledge of the subjects beforehand to properly grasp some of the terminology. As a small-time gambler myself, I thoroughly enjoyed the subject matter, and the book was an extremely quick read. It was also interesting to read how Roeper handled himself during the inevitable hot and cold streaks.

Ultimately, the book is entertaining but extremely shallow. At the end of his “journey” there is no groundbreaking revelation and it feels like the author did not learn much of anything from the whole ordeal. I feel that a better test would be to spend 30 days gambling using methods that could actually win. Roeper knew that playing the slots and the lotto was basically like burning his money, yet he went through with it for the sake of the book. Maybe next time he will stick to sports, blackjack, etc.

If you appreciate gambling, you will feel at home with this book. Bet The House is a good, quick read – just don’t expect to be enlightened at all.

6/10